For the video, focus on minutes 1-3 regarding assessment but the whole video is a great reference to understand the reality of “No Child Left Behind.”
Personally, I think the emphasis that is put on high stakes testing is ludicrous. Jay McClain explains it very well in my opinion when he says, “High stakes assessment has killed teachers learning and developing as assessors. It uses external tests and evaluates data…the most vital assessment is actually inside the classroom.” I think this is especially true regarding writing. In-class writing assessment is a valuable tool for students to develop their writing with the help of other students as well as with their teacher. Students must, first and foremost, learn that writing IS enjoyable. However, students are not going to have that joy for writing if emphasis is constantly put on standardized assessment of their writing. I think that giving students freedom to write, without receiving a grade is important for students to maintain that enjoyment in writing. This can be achieved through exercises such as journaling and free-writes, where they are given a choice about what they can write about and are free from the pressures of receiving a grade. Moreover, conferencing is a great way to evaluate the progress of children’s writing. Getting to know students and the power of their individual writing is a fundamental element in progressing student’s writing skills. Pat Johnson said, “Teachers want to know how they can help children”, and I feel like this should be the aim in everyday education. What are your thoughts on “No Child Left Behind” (especially pertaining to assessment)? What is your experience with this act? A goal of the act is to make all students reach the 100% proficiency level by 2014; do you think this is possible? Do you think that 100% proficiency is EVER going to be possible? What kind of pressure does this statistic put on children? Let me know what you think about the video too! :)